Posts Tagged ‘cms’

新年新项目

Tuesday, January 1st, 2008

有段时间没有更新Blog了,不是我变懒了,而是业余时间的精力被分散到了其他地方,首先是自己又建了一个短评类的Blog:Livedot.org,有点儿类似于把sideblog的内容单独分离出去,欢迎您随时光临;另外我正在基于wordpress开发一个magazine-style的网站,初始设想是将其办成有关Blog和Blogger的新闻/杂志类站点,目前最重要的首页部分已经大致设计完成,这也是我第一次独立开发一个全新的Wordpress theme,又学到了不少东西,本来我最初想用Drupal或者Modx这类正宗CMS程序,但在看了freeshipping这个网站后,我发现用Wordpress也完全能够做出CMS风格,而且这还能节省学习其他程序的精力,事实也证明,利用灵活的custom field,wordpress几乎无所不能,如果再配合jQuery或者Mootools这类javascript框架,甚至还可以做得很华丽。

blog and blogger

说一下自己的wishlist吧:

  • 运营好blog and blogger这个站点,同时希望有朋友能够加入,如果您有兴趣,请联系kenshin2010[at]gmail.com
  • 设计3-4个wordpress themes,其中可能包括1-2个商业模板
  • 写1-2本与wordpress有关的电子书

这辈子大概不能和喜欢的人在一起了,那就尽量做写自己喜欢的事吧^_^

Drupal 5 beta 2发布

Wednesday, November 29th, 2006

Drupal发布了其5.0 beta 2版,准备升级中。。。
[tags]drupal,cms[/tags]

powered by performancing firefox

2006开源CMS大奖最终评选结果

Tuesday, November 14th, 2006

Packt主办的2006年度开源CMS大奖最终结果出炉,这个奖设立的目的在于鼓励,支持,寻找以及奖励那些开源的内容管理系统(即CMS),这里是此次评选的候选者名单,最后入围决赛的有:Drupal,e107,Joomla!,Plone和Xoops,基本上都是大家耳熟能详的名字,而Joomla!成为最终的冠军,得到$5000奖金,Drupal获得第二名。
最终排名

  1. Joomla!- $5,000
  2. Drupal - $3,000
  3. Plone - $2,000

我建立了两个测试站点,分别安装了Drupal最新的5.0beta 1版和Joomla!最新的1.5beta版,初步感觉Drupal更简单更灵活,而Joomla!则功能更丰富更强大,也更漂亮一些,当然仅就Blogging方面而言,它们都不如Wordpress:wink:。

[tags]cms,drupal,joomla,award[/tags]

powered by performancing firefox

今日更新

Wednesday, November 1st, 2006

[tags]software,cms[/tags]

powered by performancing firefox

Joomla 1.5还是Drupal?

Friday, August 11th, 2006

想建一个CMS,用来和MBA的同学们交流学习心得和商业信息,我试装过Joomla!,对它漂亮的外表印象深刻,但该系统对中文支持极差,虽然有汉化版本,不过我看过这些中文站点后颇感失望,而且Joomla的主题并不是完全CSS控制的,修改起来比较麻烦,Joomla! 1.5据说会是一个革命性版本,将全面支持utf8编码,还有许多其它新特性,可是等了这么长时间,1.5仍未浮出水面,有些等不及了。Drupal是另一个开源的CMS,很多人用它建Blog,单以此项论,我觉得它不如Wordpress,内容管理才是它的强项,Drupal的国际化支持比较好,功能丰富,结构简洁干净,可定制性强,所以我准备试一试Drupal,看看感觉如何,至于到底用哪一个,大概要等Joomla 1.5发布之后再决定了。

网上找到一篇比较Mambo和Drupal的旧文,参考一下:

Mambo has better look and feel and easy to configure for the first time. It has better add-on(extensions, modules, templates etc.) management.
BTW: This is something which many Open Source products need to improve upon including WordPress which powers this site.

Mambo is not very plugin-author friendly as it doesn’t provide very many hooks into the core. I think however that can be easily remedied.

Drupal is more cleanly designed with extensibility in mind and more flexible.

Drupal provides a standard high-level API for developing extensions and making it easier to extend Drupal in a standard way with uniform look-and-feel.

Drupal provides better support for internationalization through i18n module.

Drupal has better support of Search-Engine-Friendly URLs in core and through modules.

Drupal supports multiple sites with a single installation with fine-grained access control and ability to selectively share configuration settings and database tables.

Drupal comes with better templating system.

The authors concluded that Drupal is much more productive in creating and managing multiple sites with unique look-and-feel.

I am already experimenting with Drupal and I tend to agree with the conclusions above.